List of Articles Ibn Arabi

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Possibility and characteristics of transcendent obligatory presence knowledge from Ibn Arabi's point of view
  Souriah  Gheravand Mohammad Kazem Rezazadeh Joudi Nafiseh  Fayaz Bakhsh
  20.1001.1.98991735.1400.12.45.5.9
  Ibn Arabi, as one of the prominent philosophers in the field of the possibility and characteristics of the knowledge of the necessary, transcendent presence, has raised issues and arguments. This article intends to examine Ibn Arabi's views on the possibility and charac More

  Ibn Arabi, as one of the prominent philosophers in the field of the possibility and characteristics of the knowledge of the necessary, transcendent presence, has raised issues and arguments. This article intends to examine Ibn Arabi's views on the possibility and characteristics of transcendent obligatory presence knowledge with an analytical approach. The study of Ibn Arabi's views in this regard indicates that from Ibn Arabi's point of view, present knowledge is one of the true and certain conditions and knowledge, and the seeker of the knowledge of the Supreme Being must step on the path of present knowledge. Ibn Arabi's presence knowledge and knowledge is based on esoteric observation, so in Ibn Arabi's view, knowledge and knowledge is an inadequate and unreal product. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Iranian Thoughts in Ibn Arabi’s Mysticism
  Ardalan Zamani Mohammad Mohammad rezaii
  in this paper, it is attempted to highlight the ancient living Iranian thoughts which have entered the Muslims’ mysticism. The current paper has a subject-oriented method and does not address the historical relations of thoughts. In other words, the purpose is not to de More

  in this paper, it is attempted to highlight the ancient living Iranian thoughts which have entered the Muslims’ mysticism. The current paper has a subject-oriented method and does not address the historical relations of thoughts. In other words, the purpose is not to delineate the identity of ideas. Rather, it is attempted to trace these ideas in ancient Iran. In addition, to avoid a confusion of ideas as well as a historical survey of the circulation of mystical ideas amongst the mystics, only Ibn Arabi’s mysticism (as a point of theoretical mysticism amongst the Muslims at which mystical ideas are systematically conjoined) was selected and discussed in this paper. In addition, the term ‘theoretical’ tends to omit ‘practical’ mysticism. In this paper, some of the macro-notions which are the foundations of the Muslims’ mysticism including names and attributes, immutable entities and the world of imagination, the perfect man, and the oneness of being (which is the heart of these concepts) are investigated. Before this, their parallel correspondences in Iranian philosophy, i.e. Amesha Spentas, Zurvan, Faravahars, and the primitive man are discussed. It will be concluded from all these discussions that the main foundations of the Muslims’ mysticism are more or less a exegesis to Iranian philosophy. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Comparison of the opinions of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi on the issue of free will and destiny
  Somayeh Heiran Abbas  Ahmadi Saiedi mohamad ali akhgar
  In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theol More

  In this research, the issue of free will in humans and divine destiny in the views of Ibn Sina and Ibn Arabi are examined and then compared. The importance of the research is due to the distinction between Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to answer the question of free will in man and divine destiny, while both thinkers have the same procedure in explaining the issue of Qada, Qadr and free will in the philosophical discussion or There are mystics of unity. The most important similarity between the views of these two thinkers is in considering the will in humans as non-inherent, which they see in the light of God's innate will. The most important difference between Ibn Arabi's and Ibn Sina's opinions regarding divine judgment and destiny is Ibn Sina's reliance and emphasis on the knowledge of God's mercy and Ibn Arabi's emphasis on divine judgment. This difference is rooted in Ibn Sina's philosophical approach and Ibn Arabi's mystical-theological approach to analyze the subject. Regarding free will in man, Ibn Sina believes that by performing certain actions, a person has the ability to exercise his opinion and change his destiny, and God has decreed such that there is certainty and certainty in man's actions, and that judgment is based on his free will and will. And the divine decree has determined the free will in the actions of humans. According to Ibn Arabi, the judgment and fate of God's decree is in the order of fixed nobles and their requirements, and therefore the will and free will of man are also in their domain. And Qada and Qadr do not violate human free will. The method of this research is based on descriptive-analytical and using library texts. Manuscript profile